+35.8%
EQT vs STLA
-66.9%
+102.7%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | STLA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | -0.2% | +0.8% | +0.6% |
| 7D | -1.2% | -3.8% | +2.7% | -0.9% |
| 30D | +1.1% | -3.1% | +4.2% | +1.2% |
| 3M | +4.8% | -19.6% | +24.4% | +6.1% |
| 6M | -10.6% | -23.5% | +12.9% | -9.5% |
| YTD | +3.4% | -51.5% | +55.0% | +8.8% |
| 1Y | +8.7% | -39.7% | +48.3% | +10.9% |
| All | +35.8% | -66.9% | +102.7% | +45.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside STLA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus STLA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × STLA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded STLA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling