+35.8%
EQT vs PH
+133.8%
-98.0%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | -1.6% | +2.2% | +1.1% |
| 7D | -1.2% | -3.1% | +2.0% | -0.3% |
| 30D | +1.1% | -11.8% | +12.9% | +4.6% |
| 3M | +4.8% | +6.9% | -2.1% | +2.1% |
| 6M | -10.6% | -1.3% | -9.3% | -11.1% |
| YTD | +3.4% | +7.0% | -3.5% | -0.5% |
| 1Y | +8.7% | +23.1% | -14.4% | -1.3% |
| All | +35.8% | +133.8% | -98.0% | -4.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling