+38.3%
EQT vs DECK
-17.3%
+55.6%
-28.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DECK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.9% | +2.7% | -1.8% | +0.7% |
| 7D | +6.9% | +0.1% | +6.8% | +6.9% |
| 30D | +0.4% | +4.8% | -4.4% | +0.1% |
| 3M | -2.0% | -6.9% | +4.9% | -1.7% |
| 6M | -5.0% | -7.6% | +2.6% | -4.9% |
| YTD | -0.3% | -16.3% | +16.0% | +0.2% |
| 1Y | -11.3% | +4.5% | -15.8% | -12.6% |
| 3Y | +38.3% | -17.1% | +55.4% | +38.9% |
| All | +38.3% | -17.3% | +55.6% | +38.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DECK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DECK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DECK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DECK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling