+35.8%
EQT vs CFG
+183.3%
-147.5%
-31.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | CFG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.6% | +0.4% | +0.2% | +0.5% |
| 7D | -1.2% | -1.7% | +0.5% | -0.7% |
| 30D | +1.1% | -4.6% | +5.7% | +2.4% |
| 3M | +4.8% | +7.9% | -3.1% | +2.0% |
| 6M | -10.6% | +19.9% | -30.4% | -16.2% |
| YTD | +3.4% | +21.7% | -18.3% | -4.2% |
| 1Y | +8.7% | +38.4% | -29.8% | -4.2% |
| All | +35.8% | +183.3% | -147.5% | -11.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CFG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CFG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CFG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CFG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling