-55.0%
EPAM vs ABCL
+104.5%
-159.4%
-75.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.4% | -1.2% | -1.2% | -2.2% |
| 7D | +2.0% | +0.7% | +1.2% | +1.9% |
| 30D | +6.5% | +93.1% | -86.5% | -2.4% |
| 3M | +19.9% | +79.4% | -59.5% | +10.1% |
| 6M | -16.9% | +214.9% | -231.8% | -30.2% |
| YTD | -42.9% | +234.2% | -277.1% | -52.9% |
| 1Y | -30.4% | +174.8% | -205.1% | -41.9% |
| All | -55.0% | +104.5% | -159.4% | -64.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling