-89.5%
EOSE vs NIO
-53.2%
-36.3%
-91.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -9.0% | -5.9% | -3.2% | -6.6% |
| 7D | -3.7% | -4.7% | +1.0% | -1.8% |
| 30D | -22.0% | -14.3% | -7.7% | -16.6% |
| 3M | -57.3% | -32.8% | -24.5% | -50.1% |
| 6M | -77.7% | -49.8% | -27.8% | -71.0% |
| YTD | -84.2% | -40.2% | -44.0% | -81.3% |
| 1Y | -89.5% | -52.7% | -36.8% | -84.0% |
| All | -89.5% | -53.2% | -36.3% | -84.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling