-84.8%
EOSE vs NIO
-54.1%
-30.7%
-91.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +12.6% | +3.4% | +9.2% | +11.3% |
| 7D | +9.7% | -0.6% | +10.3% | +10.1% |
| 30D | -34.6% | -3.5% | -31.0% | -33.4% |
| 3M | -50.8% | -30.7% | -20.1% | -44.2% |
| 6M | -66.5% | -45.6% | -20.8% | -58.8% |
| YTD | -81.3% | -35.3% | -46.0% | -78.7% |
| 1Y | -84.8% | -53.9% | -30.9% | -81.2% |
| All | -84.8% | -54.1% | -30.7% | -81.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling