-47.1%
EOSE vs NIO
-37.4%
-9.7%
-84.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +10.9% | -1.6% | +12.4% | +11.4% |
| 7D | +19.0% | -13.0% | +32.1% | +25.3% |
| 30D | +1.6% | -18.3% | +19.9% | +9.7% |
| 3M | -52.0% | -33.2% | -18.8% | -43.9% |
| 6M | -42.5% | -21.5% | -21.0% | -39.6% |
| YTD | -66.1% | -25.5% | -40.7% | -63.2% |
| 1Y | -47.1% | -38.0% | -9.1% | -34.6% |
| All | -47.1% | -37.4% | -9.7% | -34.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling