+51.5%
EOSE vs M
+106.8%
-55.3%
-84.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | M | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.5% | -4.2% | +0.7% | -1.5% |
| 7D | +15.0% | -4.1% | +19.0% | +17.2% |
| 30D | +2.5% | -13.6% | +16.1% | +9.7% |
| 3M | -33.7% | -2.3% | -31.4% | -33.4% |
| 6M | -32.7% | +21.9% | -54.6% | -38.5% |
| YTD | -63.8% | -0.6% | -63.2% | -64.3% |
| 1Y | -40.5% | +29.7% | -70.3% | -48.3% |
| All | +51.5% | +106.8% | -55.3% | -20.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside M.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus M return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × M return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded M wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling