-24.5%
EOSE vs KRMN
+17.6%
-42.1%
-84.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | KRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +2.6% | -3.6% | -2.0% |
| 7D | +1.8% | -11.8% | +13.6% | +6.8% |
| 30D | -6.8% | -43.0% | +36.2% | +16.6% |
| 3M | -36.3% | -28.8% | -7.4% | -27.7% |
| 6M | -38.8% | -66.3% | +27.6% | -8.5% |
| YTD | -65.5% | -51.8% | -13.7% | -54.8% |
| 1Y | -45.3% | -44.7% | -0.6% | -31.7% |
| All | -24.5% | +17.6% | -42.1% | -28.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling