-76.9%
EOSE vs ALHC
-60.0%
-16.9%
-82.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.5% | -1.9% | +7.4% | +5.6% |
| 7D | +9.8% | +0.3% | +9.5% | +9.8% |
| 30D | -2.1% | -10.6% | +8.5% | -2.2% |
| 3M | -54.1% | -45.3% | -8.8% | -55.4% |
| 6M | -76.9% | -59.7% | -17.2% | -75.8% |
| All | -76.9% | -60.0% | -16.9% | -75.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling