+115.6%
EOG vs NTAP
+124.7%
-9.1%
-33.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTAP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -2.5% | +4.3% | +2.2% |
| 7D | +7.6% | +7.2% | +0.4% | +6.2% |
| 30D | +3.4% | -18.4% | +21.7% | +7.0% |
| 3M | +12.7% | -11.3% | +24.0% | +14.3% |
| 6M | +19.0% | +53.8% | -34.8% | +4.9% |
| YTD | +55.6% | +72.0% | -16.4% | +32.3% |
| 1Y | +49.5% | +68.0% | -18.5% | +27.8% |
| 3Y | +43.2% | +149.5% | -106.3% | +2.5% |
| All | +115.6% | +124.7% | -9.1% | +52.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTAP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTAP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTAP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTAP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling