+21.8%
EOG vs LCID
-92.3%
+114.1%
-23.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | -1.1% | +1.2% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -2.0% | +1.8% | -3.8% | -2.1% |
| 30D | +7.9% | -34.2% | +42.1% | +8.9% |
| 3M | +4.5% | -9.1% | +13.6% | +4.1% |
| 6M | +12.3% | -52.6% | +64.9% | +14.5% |
| YTD | +41.9% | -56.2% | +98.1% | +44.9% |
| 1Y | +27.8% | -74.9% | +102.7% | +33.2% |
| 3Y | +21.8% | -92.1% | +113.9% | +33.6% |
| All | +21.8% | -92.3% | +114.1% | +33.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling