+98.1%
EOG vs FLNC
-71.1%
+169.2%
-33.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.3% | -4.2% | +4.6% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +1.0% | -5.0% | +6.0% | +1.2% |
| 30D | +2.8% | -26.1% | +28.9% | +4.0% |
| 3M | +5.9% | -55.2% | +61.1% | +9.0% |
| 6M | +17.1% | -42.6% | +59.7% | +17.4% |
| YTD | +43.9% | -51.0% | +94.9% | +44.4% |
| 1Y | +26.9% | +43.3% | -16.5% | +15.9% |
| 3Y | +23.6% | -63.4% | +87.0% | +16.5% |
| All | +98.1% | -71.1% | +169.2% | +83.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling