+68.6%
ENTG vs UMAC
+129.0%
-60.4%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +2.2% | -2.5% | +4.6% | +2.5% |
| 7D | +1.2% | -3.4% | +4.6% | +1.6% |
| 30D | -12.9% | -15.1% | +2.2% | -11.6% |
| 3M | -3.1% | -10.8% | +7.7% | -3.8% |
| 6M | +21.0% | +15.7% | +5.3% | +13.6% |
| YTD | +67.0% | +80.1% | -13.1% | +39.4% |
| 1Y | +68.6% | +116.7% | -48.1% | +41.7% |
| All | +68.6% | +129.0% | -60.4% | +41.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling