+56.3%
ENTG vs LCID
-90.9%
+147.2%
-56.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +9.4% | +9.4% | 0.0% | +7.6% |
| 7D | -7.6% | +20.0% | -27.6% | -10.8% |
| 30D | -15.5% | -5.0% | -10.5% | -15.2% |
| 3M | -7.8% | -48.9% | +41.0% | +3.7% |
| 6M | -5.9% | -43.2% | +37.3% | +0.6% |
| YTD | +66.7% | -65.9% | +132.7% | +95.8% |
| 1Y | +62.1% | -79.2% | +141.3% | +110.9% |
| 3Y | +56.3% | -90.4% | +146.7% | +124.6% |
| All | +56.3% | -90.9% | +147.2% | +124.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling