+38.5%
ENTG vs GLDM
+105.8%
-67.3%
-56.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -12.7% | +0.8% | -13.5% | -13.1% |
| 7D | -22.0% | +1.9% | -23.9% | -22.9% |
| 30D | -25.2% | -1.7% | -23.5% | -24.5% |
| 3M | -14.2% | -3.5% | -10.7% | -12.6% |
| 6M | -16.3% | -10.1% | -6.2% | -12.2% |
| YTD | +48.5% | -5.0% | +53.6% | +54.2% |
| 1Y | +41.4% | +2.8% | +38.6% | +43.4% |
| All | +38.5% | +105.8% | -67.3% | -0.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling