+65.8%
ENTG vs BLDR
-49.4%
+115.2%
-56.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.3% | -0.9% | +12.2% | +11.7% |
| 7D | +7.9% | -10.3% | +18.2% | +13.6% |
| 30D | -3.6% | +19.6% | -23.1% | -13.7% |
| 3M | +2.7% | -17.0% | +19.7% | +10.1% |
| 6M | +3.6% | -16.7% | +20.3% | +10.1% |
| YTD | +83.6% | -39.4% | +123.0% | +126.9% |
| 1Y | +84.9% | -41.7% | +126.5% | +132.2% |
| All | +65.8% | -49.4% | +115.2% | +107.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling