+49.4%
ENTG vs BLDR
-55.5%
+104.9%
-56.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | -4.9% | +6.6% | +4.2% |
| 7D | +8.9% | -0.3% | +9.3% | +9.0% |
| 30D | -7.2% | -16.2% | +9.0% | +1.0% |
| 3M | +6.4% | -14.4% | +20.8% | +13.9% |
| 6M | +25.7% | -32.8% | +58.5% | +51.5% |
| YTD | +67.9% | -39.2% | +107.0% | +110.8% |
| 1Y | +72.4% | -57.7% | +130.0% | +158.5% |
| All | +49.4% | -55.5% | +104.9% | +105.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling