+82.4%
ENTG vs ALHC
-55.7%
+138.1%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.8% | -1.9% | -1.9% | -3.7% |
| 7D | +15.2% | +0.3% | +14.9% | +15.2% |
| 30D | -3.6% | -10.6% | +6.9% | -3.3% |
| 3M | -10.0% | -45.3% | +35.4% | -8.0% |
| 6M | +1.8% | -59.7% | +61.5% | +5.5% |
| YTD | +75.5% | -62.7% | +138.2% | +74.2% |
| 1Y | +82.4% | -56.1% | +138.5% | +70.7% |
| All | +82.4% | -55.7% | +138.1% | +70.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling