+65.7%
ENTG vs ALHC
-51.4%
+117.2%
-41.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -6.5% | +10.1% | -16.6% | -6.6% |
| 7D | -10.3% | -0.5% | -9.8% | -10.2% |
| 30D | -14.4% | -4.2% | -10.1% | -14.2% |
| 3M | -1.1% | -39.8% | +38.7% | +0.8% |
| 6M | +3.0% | -57.7% | +60.7% | +7.2% |
| YTD | +70.1% | -58.8% | +128.9% | +68.0% |
| 1Y | +65.7% | -52.4% | +118.1% | +53.7% |
| All | +65.7% | -51.4% | +117.2% | +53.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling