+65.8%
ENTG vs ABCL
+197.3%
-131.4%
-56.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +11.3% | -4.1% | +15.4% | +12.3% |
| 7D | +7.9% | -2.7% | +10.6% | +8.7% |
| 30D | -3.6% | -5.4% | +1.9% | -2.2% |
| 3M | +2.7% | +22.4% | -19.7% | -2.7% |
| 6M | +3.6% | +127.6% | -124.1% | -18.7% |
| YTD | +83.6% | +249.4% | -165.8% | +26.6% |
| 1Y | +84.9% | +198.0% | -113.1% | +32.4% |
| All | +65.8% | +197.3% | -131.4% | +2.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling