-37.9%
ENPH vs PFGC
+17.7%
-55.6%
-65.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.7% | +1.1% | -3.8% | -2.7% |
| 7D | -8.4% | +3.4% | -11.8% | -8.5% |
| 30D | -11.2% | +16.9% | -28.1% | -11.3% |
| 3M | -36.1% | +6.4% | -42.5% | -36.9% |
| 6M | -37.9% | +16.0% | -53.9% | -33.1% |
| All | -37.9% | +17.7% | -55.6% | -33.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling