-70.3%
ENPH vs NTNX
+82.3%
-152.6%
-81.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NTNX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | +0.8% | -2.1% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -3.1% | +3.1% | +0.2% |
| 30D | -10.8% | +2.0% | -12.8% | -11.0% |
| 3M | -33.8% | +34.0% | -67.8% | -35.4% |
| 6M | -16.1% | +72.4% | -88.5% | -20.6% |
| YTD | +13.4% | +27.5% | -14.1% | +9.4% |
| 1Y | -2.6% | -18.7% | +16.1% | -3.6% |
| 3Y | -70.3% | +80.8% | -151.0% | -80.3% |
| All | -70.3% | +82.3% | -152.6% | -80.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NTNX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NTNX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NTNX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NTNX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling