-70.3%
ENPH vs LNT
+46.9%
-117.2%
-81.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.4% | 0.0% | -1.4% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -0.1% | -1.0% | +1.0% | +0.4% |
| 30D | -10.8% | -4.2% | -6.6% | -9.3% |
| 3M | -33.8% | -6.7% | -27.1% | -32.6% |
| 6M | -16.1% | -3.6% | -12.6% | -16.6% |
| YTD | +13.4% | +5.9% | +7.5% | +6.0% |
| 1Y | -2.6% | +7.3% | -9.9% | -10.3% |
| 3Y | -70.3% | +46.5% | -116.7% | -80.4% |
| All | -70.3% | +46.9% | -117.2% | -80.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling