-71.5%
ENPH vs LDOS
+39.7%
-111.3%
-81.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | +0.5% | -0.4% | +0.1% |
| 7D | -2.4% | -5.4% | +3.0% | -1.9% |
| 30D | -6.6% | +4.9% | -11.5% | -6.8% |
| 3M | -46.8% | +7.2% | -54.0% | -46.7% |
| 6M | -14.7% | -24.2% | +9.5% | -12.1% |
| YTD | +13.5% | -25.8% | +39.3% | +17.3% |
| 1Y | -0.4% | -24.7% | +24.3% | +2.6% |
| All | -71.5% | +39.7% | -111.3% | -79.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling