-64.8%
ENPH vs LDOS
+37.2%
-102.0%
-81.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LDOS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.0% | +1.1% | -6.0% | -5.0% |
| 7D | -9.1% | +1.9% | -11.0% | -9.2% |
| 30D | -15.8% | +12.8% | -28.5% | -16.3% |
| 3M | -32.5% | -1.0% | -31.4% | -32.4% |
| 6M | -24.2% | +6.2% | -30.4% | -24.0% |
| YTD | -13.8% | -23.2% | +9.5% | -12.0% |
| 1Y | -15.8% | -29.5% | +13.6% | -13.6% |
| All | -64.8% | +37.2% | -102.0% | -72.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LDOS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LDOS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LDOS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LDOS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling