-89.3%
ENPH vs LCID
-99.3%
+10.0%
-92.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | LCID | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.7% | -9.2% | +6.6% | -0.1% |
| 7D | -8.4% | -10.2% | +1.8% | -6.0% |
| 30D | -11.2% | -10.2% | -1.0% | -9.7% |
| 3M | -36.1% | -54.1% | +18.0% | -22.1% |
| 6M | -37.9% | -53.8% | +15.8% | -27.8% |
| YTD | -18.7% | -72.0% | +53.4% | +7.0% |
| 1Y | -9.8% | -80.5% | +70.7% | +31.4% |
| 3Y | -66.8% | -92.6% | +25.7% | -43.1% |
| All | -89.3% | -99.3% | +10.0% | -65.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LCID.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LCID return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LCID return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LCID wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling