-28.5%
ENPH vs HTZ
-75.0%
+46.5%
-65.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.4% | -6.1% | +0.7% | -4.3% |
| 7D | -7.6% | -14.0% | +6.4% | -5.3% |
| 30D | -16.4% | -19.8% | +3.4% | -13.2% |
| 3M | -34.3% | -45.0% | +10.7% | -29.2% |
| 6M | -28.5% | -73.2% | +44.7% | -10.4% |
| All | -28.5% | -75.0% | +46.5% | -10.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling