-83.6%
ENPH vs FLNC
-71.1%
-12.5%
-92.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FLNC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.4% | -4.2% | +4.6% | +1.7% |
| 7D | +1.5% | -5.0% | +6.5% | +3.1% |
| 30D | -12.9% | -26.1% | +13.2% | -4.4% |
| 3M | -27.1% | -55.2% | +28.1% | -7.3% |
| 6M | -15.4% | -42.6% | +27.2% | -8.7% |
| YTD | +15.0% | -51.0% | +66.0% | +23.5% |
| 1Y | -0.7% | +43.3% | -44.0% | -34.9% |
| 3Y | -69.3% | -63.4% | -5.9% | -72.5% |
| All | -83.6% | -71.1% | -12.5% | -87.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FLNC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FLNC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FLNC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FLNC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling