-69.9%
ENPH vs BLDR
-56.4%
-13.6%
-81.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BLDR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.4% | -1.9% | -3.5% | -4.5% |
| 7D | +3.4% | -2.7% | +6.1% | +4.5% |
| 30D | -10.3% | -14.7% | +4.4% | -3.3% |
| 3M | -31.4% | -20.8% | -10.5% | -24.2% |
| 6M | -10.1% | -35.3% | +25.2% | +8.7% |
| YTD | +14.6% | -40.3% | +54.9% | +44.3% |
| 1Y | -3.2% | -56.3% | +53.1% | +40.7% |
| All | -69.9% | -56.4% | -13.6% | -62.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BLDR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BLDR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BLDR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BLDR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling