+68.8%
ENB vs HTZ
-86.4%
+155.2%
-13.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | HTZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | +1.3% | -2.2% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.2% | +7.5% | -7.7% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -2.2% | +47.4% | -49.7% | -3.2% |
| 3M | -10.5% | -54.9% | +44.4% | -9.3% |
| 6M | -5.1% | -47.0% | +41.9% | -4.4% |
| YTD | +9.0% | -55.3% | +64.2% | +10.1% |
| 1Y | +8.2% | -57.6% | +65.9% | +9.2% |
| All | +68.8% | -86.4% | +155.2% | +101.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside HTZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus HTZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × HTZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded HTZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling