+79.3%
ENB vs FROG
+206.6%
-127.3%
-13.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FROG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -3.3% | +2.5% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -0.2% | -11.3% | +11.1% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -2.2% | +3.6% | -5.9% | -2.3% |
| 3M | -10.5% | +1.7% | -12.2% | -10.6% |
| 6M | -5.1% | +123.5% | -128.6% | -7.3% |
| YTD | +9.0% | +40.2% | -31.3% | +7.9% |
| 1Y | +8.2% | +81.0% | -72.8% | +5.7% |
| All | +79.3% | +206.6% | -127.3% | +61.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FROG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FROG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FROG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FROG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling