+79.3%
ENB vs ARMK
+120.0%
-40.7%
-13.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.9% | -0.9% | 0.0% | -0.7% |
| 7D | -0.2% | -2.4% | +2.2% | +0.1% |
| 30D | -2.2% | 0.0% | -2.3% | -2.3% |
| 3M | -10.5% | +6.7% | -17.2% | -11.3% |
| 6M | -5.1% | +38.8% | -43.9% | -9.1% |
| YTD | +9.0% | +55.2% | -46.2% | +2.6% |
| 1Y | +8.2% | +46.6% | -38.4% | +2.7% |
| All | +79.3% | +120.0% | -40.7% | +52.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling