+70.1%
ENB vs ALHC
+22.7%
+47.4%
-19.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ALHC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.5% | -1.9% | +2.4% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +3.1% | +0.3% | +2.8% | +3.1% |
| 30D | +2.1% | -10.6% | +12.7% | +2.3% |
| 3M | -4.4% | -45.3% | +40.9% | -3.4% |
| 6M | -10.1% | -59.7% | +49.7% | -8.8% |
| YTD | +5.2% | -62.7% | +67.9% | +6.7% |
| 1Y | +4.2% | -56.1% | +60.4% | +5.4% |
| 3Y | +70.1% | +21.3% | +48.8% | +74.2% |
| All | +70.1% | +22.7% | +47.4% | +74.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ALHC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ALHC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ALHC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ALHC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling