+58.3%
EMR vs TXG
+41.0%
+17.3%
-29.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TXG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.2% | +2.6% | -3.8% | -1.6% |
| 7D | +0.9% | +9.1% | -8.2% | -0.6% |
| 30D | -5.0% | +14.9% | -19.8% | -7.4% |
| 3M | +5.9% | +120.0% | -114.1% | -8.9% |
| 6M | +7.3% | +221.8% | -214.5% | -14.4% |
| YTD | +14.6% | +312.6% | -298.0% | -12.8% |
| 1Y | +15.6% | +398.4% | -382.8% | -15.9% |
| All | +58.3% | +41.0% | +17.3% | +28.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TXG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TXG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TXG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TXG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling