+103.3%
EMR vs TXG
+65.2%
+38.0%
-29.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TXG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -1.5% | +1.6% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +2.8% | -1.8% | +4.7% | +3.1% |
| 30D | +3.7% | -20.4% | +24.1% | +7.1% |
| 3M | +2.0% | +0.1% | +2.0% | +0.2% |
| 6M | +22.1% | +176.2% | -154.1% | -1.4% |
| YTD | +27.2% | +256.8% | -229.5% | -2.5% |
| 1Y | +32.0% | +255.9% | -223.9% | +0.8% |
| 3Y | +103.3% | +60.2% | +43.0% | +56.2% |
| All | +103.3% | +65.2% | +38.0% | +56.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TXG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TXG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TXG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TXG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling