+83.4%
EMR vs GLDM
+121.8%
-38.4%
-29.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.2% | -0.8% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -1.6% | +4.7% | -6.2% | -2.7% |
| 30D | +2.0% | -0.9% | +2.8% | +2.2% |
| 3M | +3.8% | -4.3% | +8.1% | +4.8% |
| 6M | +10.5% | -13.4% | +23.9% | +13.9% |
| YTD | +23.7% | -5.8% | +29.5% | +26.8% |
| 1Y | +25.4% | +2.1% | +23.4% | +27.6% |
| 3Y | +86.6% | +105.0% | -18.5% | +63.7% |
| All | +83.4% | +121.8% | -38.4% | +50.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling