+64.6%
EMR vs FN
+158.4%
-93.8%
-29.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | FN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.7% | +3.1% | -1.4% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -1.5% | -1.7% | +0.2% | -1.2% |
| 30D | -5.6% | -22.0% | +16.4% | -2.2% |
| 3M | +7.9% | -43.0% | +50.9% | +17.3% |
| 6M | +6.0% | -27.7% | +33.8% | +8.7% |
| YTD | +16.4% | -10.5% | +27.0% | +13.2% |
| 1Y | +16.6% | +12.5% | +4.1% | +7.3% |
| All | +64.6% | +158.4% | -93.8% | +22.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling