+103.3%
EMR vs BHP
+53.3%
+49.9%
-29.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BHP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -1.3% | +1.3% | +0.6% |
| 7D | +2.8% | -0.5% | +3.3% | +3.1% |
| 30D | +3.7% | -4.5% | +8.2% | +5.8% |
| 3M | +2.0% | -6.9% | +8.9% | +4.9% |
| 6M | +22.1% | -10.6% | +32.7% | +27.0% |
| YTD | +27.2% | +37.2% | -10.0% | +8.8% |
| 1Y | +32.0% | +48.0% | -16.0% | +9.2% |
| 3Y | +103.3% | +52.6% | +50.7% | +58.0% |
| All | +103.3% | +53.3% | +49.9% | +58.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BHP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BHP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BHP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BHP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling