+99.5%
EMGF vs VOO
+79.1%
+20.4%
-17.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -0.6% | +0.6% | +0.5% |
| 7D | +2.4% | +0.5% | +1.9% | +1.9% |
| 30D | +5.0% | -0.9% | +5.9% | +5.8% |
| 3M | +4.9% | +3.9% | +1.0% | +1.7% |
| 6M | +22.0% | +14.5% | +7.4% | +9.9% |
| YTD | +28.5% | +13.0% | +15.5% | +17.0% |
| 1Y | +38.5% | +19.4% | +19.1% | +21.5% |
| 3Y | +99.5% | +78.9% | +20.6% | +26.3% |
| All | +99.5% | +79.1% | +20.4% | +26.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling