+31.1%
EMB vs PENG
+101.4%
-70.3%
-5.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +6.4% | -6.4% | -0.2% |
| 7D | 0.0% | +4.5% | -4.6% | -0.1% |
| 30D | -0.3% | -7.1% | +6.8% | -0.2% |
| 3M | -0.4% | -27.3% | +26.8% | 0.0% |
| 6M | +0.1% | +169.6% | -169.5% | -4.0% |
| YTD | +1.6% | +164.6% | -163.0% | -2.6% |
| 1Y | +5.6% | +109.5% | -103.9% | +1.8% |
| All | +31.1% | +101.4% | -70.3% | +24.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling