+28.8%
EMB vs NIO
-59.9%
+88.7%
-5.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +5.9% | -5.9% | -0.2% |
| 7D | -0.1% | +5.6% | -5.7% | -0.3% |
| 30D | +1.3% | -4.2% | +5.5% | +1.4% |
| 3M | -2.7% | -26.3% | +23.6% | -1.9% |
| 6M | -2.8% | -42.5% | +39.7% | -1.4% |
| YTD | -1.1% | -33.5% | +32.4% | -0.2% |
| 1Y | 0.0% | -52.7% | +52.6% | +1.9% |
| 3Y | +28.8% | -57.5% | +86.3% | +29.9% |
| All | +28.8% | -59.9% | +88.7% | +29.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling