+102.9%
EFA vs ZM
+48.4%
+54.5%
-33.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -4.8% | +4.3% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +1.2% | +1.6% | -0.4% | +1.1% |
| 30D | -0.7% | -7.7% | +7.0% | -0.3% |
| 3M | +6.4% | -4.7% | +11.1% | +6.6% |
| 6M | +11.4% | +24.4% | -13.1% | +9.4% |
| YTD | +14.0% | +11.8% | +2.2% | +12.6% |
| 1Y | +20.2% | +13.4% | +6.9% | +18.5% |
| 3Y | +68.2% | +33.8% | +34.4% | +63.3% |
| 5Y | +54.8% | -67.2% | +122.0% | +51.4% |
| All | +102.9% | +48.4% | +54.5% | +88.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling