+64.6%
EFA vs XLC
+70.4%
-5.8%
-14.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -0.6% | -0.5% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -0.5% | -1.4% | +0.9% | +0.3% |
| 30D | -1.3% | -0.9% | -0.4% | -0.9% |
| 3M | +5.2% | -0.3% | +5.5% | +5.1% |
| 6M | +9.4% | -5.2% | +14.5% | +12.3% |
| YTD | +12.7% | -5.3% | +18.0% | +15.8% |
| 1Y | +19.3% | -2.8% | +22.1% | +20.6% |
| All | +64.6% | +70.4% | -5.8% | +24.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling