+39.2%
EFA vs PLTU
+121.9%
-82.7%
-14.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | PLTU | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.2% | -4.2% | +4.4% | +0.3% |
| 7D | +2.2% | +9.0% | -6.8% | +1.8% |
| 30D | +1.4% | -33.0% | +34.4% | +2.8% |
| 3M | -4.2% | -19.0% | +14.8% | -3.8% |
| 6M | +1.9% | +30.4% | -28.5% | -1.0% |
| YTD | +10.2% | -40.2% | +50.4% | +10.2% |
| 1Y | +12.8% | -37.8% | +50.6% | +12.4% |
| All | +39.2% | +121.9% | -82.7% | +22.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PLTU.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PLTU return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PLTU return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PLTU wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling