+70.8%
EFA vs NXT
+178.8%
-108.0%
-14.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | NXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.1% | +1.2% | -1.1% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +0.6% | -1.1% | +1.7% | +0.7% |
| 30D | +0.9% | -15.3% | +16.2% | +2.2% |
| 3M | +4.9% | -43.8% | +48.7% | +9.4% |
| 6M | +8.6% | -18.7% | +27.2% | +9.6% |
| YTD | +14.6% | -3.0% | +17.6% | +13.9% |
| 1Y | +22.6% | +22.7% | -0.1% | +19.1% |
| 3Y | +66.5% | +95.9% | -29.4% | +51.1% |
| All | +70.8% | +178.8% | -108.0% | +49.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling