+68.2%
EFA vs NIO
-62.3%
+130.5%
-14.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | NIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -0.3% | -0.3% | -0.5% |
| 7D | +1.2% | -6.7% | +7.8% | +1.7% |
| 30D | -0.7% | -20.0% | +19.3% | +0.9% |
| 3M | +6.4% | -30.5% | +36.9% | +9.2% |
| 6M | +11.4% | -20.7% | +32.1% | +12.9% |
| YTD | +14.0% | -25.7% | +39.7% | +16.0% |
| 1Y | +20.2% | -38.6% | +58.8% | +23.5% |
| 3Y | +68.2% | -62.3% | +130.5% | +72.7% |
| All | +68.2% | -62.3% | +130.5% | +72.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside NIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus NIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × NIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded NIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling