+61.5%
EFA vs GLDM
+104.2%
-42.7%
-14.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.8% | -0.8% | 0.0% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -1.4% | +4.7% | -6.1% | -2.7% |
| 30D | -1.2% | -0.9% | -0.3% | -1.0% |
| 3M | -5.1% | -4.3% | -0.8% | -4.1% |
| 6M | -1.2% | -13.4% | +12.2% | +2.3% |
| YTD | +7.8% | -5.8% | +13.6% | +8.5% |
| 1Y | +12.2% | +2.1% | +10.1% | +10.4% |
| 3Y | +61.5% | +105.0% | -43.5% | +21.9% |
| All | +61.5% | +104.2% | -42.7% | +21.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling