+70.7%
EEM vs ZETA
+348.6%
-277.9%
-18.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.4% | -1.7% | +1.3% | -0.2% |
| 7D | +2.7% | +18.1% | -15.4% | +1.3% |
| 30D | -5.4% | +13.6% | -19.0% | -6.4% |
| 3M | -8.6% | +23.7% | -32.4% | -10.3% |
| 6M | -8.9% | +128.5% | -137.4% | -14.9% |
| YTD | +11.9% | +80.1% | -68.2% | +5.9% |
| 1Y | +13.1% | +98.0% | -84.9% | +6.1% |
| 3Y | +70.7% | +348.6% | -277.9% | +38.3% |
| All | +70.7% | +348.6% | -277.9% | +38.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling