+85.9%
EEM vs TNA
+101.9%
-15.9%
-17.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TNA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | +1.1% | +0.2% | +1.0% |
| 7D | -1.3% | -7.3% | +6.0% | +0.2% |
| 30D | +2.1% | -14.2% | +16.2% | +5.1% |
| 3M | +1.0% | -4.6% | +5.6% | +1.9% |
| 6M | +15.9% | +36.9% | -21.0% | +9.4% |
| YTD | +24.6% | +42.5% | -17.9% | +16.5% |
| 1Y | +32.3% | +45.8% | -13.5% | +22.5% |
| 3Y | +85.9% | +104.7% | -18.7% | +52.8% |
| All | +85.9% | +101.9% | -15.9% | +52.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TNA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TNA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TNA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TNA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling