+87.7%
EEM vs PFGC
+61.7%
+26.0%
-17.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PFGC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.5% | -1.2% | +0.7% | -0.3% |
| 7D | +2.0% | -3.7% | +5.7% | +2.7% |
| 30D | +5.1% | -16.0% | +21.0% | +8.4% |
| 3M | +4.6% | -4.1% | +8.7% | +4.6% |
| 6M | +17.8% | +8.7% | +9.1% | +14.3% |
| YTD | +25.8% | +6.4% | +19.5% | +22.4% |
| 1Y | +36.4% | -8.4% | +44.8% | +36.7% |
| All | +87.7% | +61.7% | +26.0% | +61.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PFGC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PFGC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PFGC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PFGC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling