+87.7%
EEM vs PENG
+101.4%
-13.7%
-17.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PENG | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | +6.4% | -4.6% | +0.9% |
| 7D | +2.3% | +4.5% | -2.2% | +1.7% |
| 30D | +4.5% | -7.1% | +11.6% | +5.3% |
| 3M | -0.1% | -27.3% | +27.2% | +2.4% |
| 6M | +16.9% | +169.6% | -152.6% | +1.6% |
| YTD | +26.2% | +164.6% | -138.4% | +9.6% |
| 1Y | +40.5% | +109.5% | -69.0% | +24.4% |
| All | +87.7% | +101.4% | -13.7% | +60.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PENG.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PENG return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PENG return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PENG wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling