+85.9%
EEM vs MDLZ
-2.9%
+88.8%
-17.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | MDLZ | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.3% | 0.0% | +1.3% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -1.3% | +1.9% | -3.1% | -1.2% |
| 30D | +2.1% | +0.4% | +1.7% | +2.1% |
| 3M | +1.0% | -0.6% | +1.7% | +1.3% |
| 6M | +15.9% | +14.7% | +1.2% | +14.5% |
| YTD | +24.6% | +18.0% | +6.7% | +22.9% |
| 1Y | +32.3% | +4.1% | +28.2% | +31.8% |
| 3Y | +85.9% | -4.6% | +90.5% | +82.2% |
| All | +85.9% | -2.9% | +88.8% | +82.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MDLZ.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MDLZ return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MDLZ return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MDLZ wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling